Network Working Group R. Semcheddine Internet-Draft Independent Researcher Intended status: Informational 28 October 2026 Expires: 1 May 2027 Hardware-Interrupt Attestation for Privacy-Preserving Bot Mitigation draft-darkdragon-hardware-bot-attestation-00 Abstract This document proposes a privacy-first, OS kernel-level attestation mechanism to mitigate automated botnets on internet platforms. By evaluating input events at the physical hardware interrupt layer, the system generates attestation tokens only upon detecting automated execution, remaining silent during legitimate human usage to preserve user privacy. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 1 May 2027. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Semcheddine Expires 1 May 2027 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Kernel Bot Attestation October 2026 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Proposed Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.1. Hardware Interrupt Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.2. Zero-Telemetry Human Privacy Model . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.3. Negative-Attestation Token Delivery . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. Security and Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1. Introduction Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior (CIB) and automated botnets on social media platforms undermine public trust and manipulate social consensus. Existing countermeasures rely on client-side web scripts or CAPTCHAs, which are easily bypassed by modern headless browser automation. 2. Proposed Architecture The proposed system shifts attestation to the operating system kernel and hardware layer: 2.1. Hardware Interrupt Validation The OS monitors input events to verify whether they originate from physical hardware Interrupt Requests (IRQs) or synthetic software injection. 2.2. Zero-Telemetry Human Privacy Model If interaction patterns match physical hardware inputs, the OS emits no telemetry or tokens, ensuring zero user tracking during normal operation. 2.3. Negative-Attestation Token Delivery Upon isolating automated or synthetic execution, the kernel enclave generates a cryptographic attestation token delivered directly to the requesting application or platform API. 3. Security and Privacy Considerations This design prevents continuous profiling by operating on a negative- attestation model. Threat models including hardware emulation via external microcontrollers and local kernel tampering are addressed via hardware-backed secure enclaves (e.g., TPM/TrustZone). Semcheddine Expires 1 May 2027 [Page 2]