RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP)

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶

This Internet-Draft will expire on 3 September 2026.¶

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

This document describes an Application Programming Interface (API) API based on the HTTP protocol [RFC2616] and the principles of [REST]. Conforming to the REST constraints is generally referred to as being "RESTful". Hence the API is dubbed: "'RESTful Provisioning Protocol" or "RPP" for short.¶

The RPP API is designed to be used for the provisioning and management of objects in a shared database, such as domain names, hosts, and entities.¶

2. Terminology

In this document the following terminology is used.¶

REST - Representational State Transfer ([REST]). An architectural style.¶

RESTful - A RESTful web service is a web service or API implemented using HTTP and the principles of [REST].¶

EPP RFCs - This is a reference to the EPP version 1.0 specifications [RFC5730], [RFC5731], [RFC5732] and [RFC5733].¶

RESTful Provisioning Protocol or RPP - The protocol described in this document.¶

URL - A Uniform Resource Locator as defined in [RFC3986].¶

Resource - An object having a type, data, and possible relationship to other resources, identified by a URL.¶

RPP client - An HTTP user agent performing an RPP request¶

RPP server - An HTTP server responsible for processing requests and returning results in any supported media type.¶

JWT - JSON Web Token as defined in [RFC7519].¶

3. Conventions Used in This Document

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT","SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].¶

In examples, indentation and white space in examples are provided only to illustrate element relationships and are not REQUIRED features of the protocol.¶

All example requests assume a RPP server using HTTP version 2 is listening on the standard HTTPS port on host rpp.example. An authorization token has been provided by an out of band process and MUST be used by the client to authenticate each request.¶

4. Request Headers

A RPP request does not always require a request message body. The information conveyed by the HTTP method, URL, and request headers may be sufficient for the server to be able to successfully processes a request. However, the client MUST include a request message body when the server requires additional attributes to be present in the request message. The RPP HTTP headers listed below use the "RPP-" prefix, following the recommendations in [RFC6648].¶

• RPP-Cltrid: The client transaction identifier is the equivalent of the clTRID element defined in [RFC5730] and MUST be used accordingly, when the HTTP message body does not contain an EPP request that includes a cltrid.¶

• RPP-Authorization: The client MAY use this header to send authorization information in the format <method> <authorization information>, similar to the HTTP Authorization header, defined in [RFC9110, Section 11.6.2]. The <method> indicates the type of authorization being used. For EPP object authorization information, for example the authorization information used for domain names described in [RFC5731, Section 2.3], a new authinfo method is defined and MUST be used. The <authorization information> defines the following comma separated fields:¶

  • value (REQUIRED): Base64 encoded EPP password-based authorization information. Base64 encoding is used to prevent problems when special characters are present that may conflict with the format rules for the Authorization header.¶
  • roid (OPTIONAL): A Roid as defined in [RFC5731], [RFC5733], and [RFC5730]. The roid is used to identify the object for which the authorization information is provided. If the roid is not provided, then the server MUST assume that the authorization information is linked to the object identified by the URL of the request.¶

Use of the RPP-Authorization header:¶

RPP-Authorization: authinfo value=TXkgU2VjcmV0IFRva2Vu, roid=REG-XYZ-12345

The value of the RPP-Authorization header is case sensitive. The server MUST reject requests where the case of the header value does not match the expected case. The RPP-Authorization header is specific to the user agent and MUST NOT be cached, as recommended by Section 16.4.2, the server MUST use the correct HTTP cache directives to prevent caching of the RPP-Authorization header.¶

• RPP-Profile: The client MUST use this header to indicate the profiles is used in the request.¶

5. Response Headers

The server HTTP response contains a status code, headers, and MAY contain an RPP response message in the message body. HTTP headers are used to transmit additional data to the client and MAY be used to send RPP process related data to the client. HTTP headers used by RPP MUST use the "RPP-" prefix, the following response headers have been defined for RPP.¶

• RPP-Svtrid: This header is the equivalent of the "svTRID" element defined in [RFC5730] and MUST be used accordingly when the RPP response does not contain an EPP response in the HTTP message body. If an HTTP message body with the EPP XML equivalent "svTRID" exists, both values MUST be consistent.¶

• RPP-Cltrid: This header is the equivalent of the "clTRID" element defined in [RFC5730] and MUST be used accordingly when the RPP response does not contain an EPP response in the HTTP message body. If the contents of the HTTP message body contains a "clTRID" value, then both values MUST be consistent.¶

• RPP-Code: This header is the equivalent of the EPP result code defined in [RFC5730] and MUST be used accordingly. This header MUST be added to all responses and MAY be used by the client for easy access to the result code, without having to parse the HTTP response message body.¶

For the EPP codes related to session management (1500, 2500, 2501 and 2502) there are no corresponding RPP codes.¶

In order for RPP to be backwards compatible with EPP, RPP will use 5-digit coding of the result codes, where first digit will denote origin specification of the result codes.¶

For [RFC5730] Result Codes the leading digit MUST be "0". For RPP result codes the leading digit MUST be "1". For avoidance of confusion RPP MUST not define new codes with the same semantic meaning as already defined in EPP.¶

For RPP codes the remaining 4 digits MUST keep the same semantics as [RFC5730] Result Codes.¶

• RPP-Queue-Size: Return the number of unacknowledged messages in the client message queue. The server MAY include this header in all RPP responses.¶

6. Error handling and relation between HTTP status codes and RPP codes

RPP leverages standard HTTP status codes to reflect the outcome of RPP operations. The RPP result codes are based on the EPP result codes defined in [RFC5730]. This allows clients to handle responses generically using common HTTP patterns. While the HTTP status code provides the primary, high-level outcome, the specific RPP result code MUST still be provided in the RPP-Code HTTP header for detailed diagnostics.¶

The mapping strategy is to use the most specific HTTP code that accurately reflects the operation's result.¶

For common and well-defined outcomes, a specific HTTP status code is used. For example, an attempt to access a non-existent resource (EPP code 2302) MUST return 404 Not Found, and an attempt to create a resource that already exists (EPP code 2303) MUST return 409 Conflict. This allows a client to handle these common situations based on the HTTP code alone.¶

For all other failures, a generic HTTP status code is used. Client-side errors (e.g., syntax, parameter, or policy violations) MUST return 400 Bad Request. Server-side failures MUST return 500 Internal Server Error.¶

The server MUST return HTTP status codes, following the mapping rules in Table 1.¶

Table 1: RPP result code and HTTP Status-Code mapping.¶

Some EPP result codes, like 01500, 02500, 02501 and 02502 are related to session management and therefore not applicable to a sessionless RPP protocol.¶

7. Problem Detail responses for errors

When an error occurs that prevents processing of the requested action, an RPP server MUST respond using a Problem Detail document [RFC9457] detailing what went wrong, or what was not acceptable to the server. The type field MUST be the urn:ietf:params:rpp:problem URN. The status field MUST reflect the HTTP status code. The document MUST contain an errors element, as a list of objects detailing individual errors.¶

This document consists of the following fields:¶

type

(required, string) This field MUST always contain the fixed string value urn:ietf:params:rpp:error to indicate that this is an RPP Problem Detail response.¶

title

(required, string) A short human-readable description of the Problem Detail type.¶

errors

(optional, array of error objects) MUST contain objects detailing information about the specific errors that occurred, including optional references to which values in the original request were not acceptable to the server.¶

The error object consist of the following fields:¶

type

(required, string) This field SHOULD be a URI that identifies the error type. This URI MAY be dereferenceable to obtain human-readable documentation about the error type.¶

result

(required, string) This field MUST contain the RPP result code associated with the error.¶

paths

(optional, list of strings) The JSONPath [RFC9535] to the value(s) in the request that caused the error. This field MAY be omitted if no specific value in the request can be identified as the cause of the error.¶

reason

(required, string) A human-readable detailed description of the error.¶

RPP specifications and/or extensions MAY add extension fields to the error object, to convey additional information about the causes of the error. For example, to indicate the account balance on a billing failure, the following Problem Detail response could be used:¶

{
  "type": "urn:ietf:params:rpp:error",
  "title": "RPP Error",
  "errors": [{
    "type": "https://rpp.example/problems/billing/billing-failure",
    "result": "02104",
    "reason": "Not enough balance on account to create domain",
    "balance": 10.0,
    "action_cost": 25.0
  }]
}

Problem Detail response containing multiple errors for a domain create request using an invalid domain name (_$.example), JSONPaths are specified in the error objects to indicate which value in the request caused the error:¶

{
  "type": "urn:ietf:params:rpp:error",
  "title": "RPP Error",
  "errors": [{
    "type": "https://rpp.example/problems/domains/domain-syntax",
    "result": "02005",
    "paths": ["$.domain.name"],
    "reason": "Invalid character(s) in domain name",
  },
  {
    "type": "https://rpp.example/problems/domains/domain-allowed-length",
    "result": "02004",
    "paths": ["$.domain.name"],
    "reason": "Domain name length must be between 3 and 63 characters",
  }]
}

8. Versioning

RPP is designed to be extensible and backward compatible. The version of the RPP API is indicated in the URL path, for example: https://rpp.example/rpp/v1/. The server MUST support at least one version of the RPP API, and MUST return a 404 Not Found status code for requests using an unsupported version. The versioning scheme uses the Semantic Versioning format defined in [SemVer], but only the major version number is used to indicate breaking changes. The minor and patch version numbers are not used in an URL path, but can be used in the media type or in the message body to indicate non-breaking changes.¶

The following RPP elements include versioning support:¶

• Endpoints: The server MUST support at least one version of the RPP API, and MUST return a 404 Not Found status code for requests using an unsupported version.¶
• Messages: A request and response message MUST include the version of the RPP API it is compatible with.¶
• Extensions: RPP extensions MUST include the version of the RPP API they are compatible with.¶
• Profiles: RPP profiles MUST include the version of the RPP API they are compatible with.¶
• Media types: RPP media types MUST include the version of the RPP API they are compatible with.¶
• Result codes: RPP result codes may be added by extensions or updates to the core RPP specification.¶

"extensions": [
    {
      "name": "RPP example extension",
      "id": "urn:ietf:params:rpp:extension:example-extension",
      "version": "1.0",
      "url": "https://www.iana.org/assignments/rpp-extensions/rpp-example-extension-1.0"
    }
  ],

"profiles": [
    {
      "name": "EPP compatibility profile",
      "id": "urn:ietf:params:rpp:profile:epp-compatibility",
      "version": "1.0",
      "url": "https://www.iana.org/assignments/rpp-profiles/epp-compatibility-provisioning-profile-1.0"
    }
  ]

9. Media types

RPP media types are used to indicate the format of the request and response messages, and MUST include a parameter indicating the name of the profile they are compatible with. The server MUST use the profile information in the media type to determine which features, extensions and versions to use when processing the request, and to ensure that it returns a response that is compatible with the client. The client MUST use the profile information in the media type to determine which features, extensions and versions to use when processing the response, and to ensure that it can correctly interpret the response.¶

The definition of profile parameters in media types is described in section ....¶

10. Profiles

A profile is a named set of protocol features and versions that are used to define the compatibility and capabilities of RPP server implementations, allowing for better interoperability between different implementations. Using profiles helps to simplify the implementation and deployment of RPP by providing a clear and concise way for the client and server to communicate their capabilities and requirements.¶

A profile is identified by a unique name and may be published as a standard profile in the IANA registry for RPP profiles, to promote interoperability and standardization across implementations. Standard profiles names MUST use the RPP URN namespace defined in this document, for example: urn:ietf:params:rpp:profile:{profile_name}. The profile name MUST be unique within the RPP URN namespace and SHOULD be descriptive of the features and versions included in the profile.¶

A profile can also be defined as a private profile, which is not published in the IANA registry, but is used by specific server implementations only. A private profile can be defined by a server operator to specify the features and versions supported by their implementation. If the profile is not published in the IANA registry, then the server operator MUST ensure that the profile name is globally unique to avoid conflicts with other profiles, the use of reverse domain name notation is RECOMMENDED for private profiles to ensure uniqueness.¶

{
  "name": "urn:ietf:params:rpp:profile:example-profile",
  "description": "An example profile for provisioning objects using the RPP protocol.",
  "version": "1.0",
  "rpp_version": "1.0",
  "objects": ["domains", "hosts", "entities"],
  "extensions": [
    {
      "rppExample": {
        "version": "1.0"
      },
      "rppOther": {
        "version": "1.1"
      }
    }
  ],
  "profile": {
    "name": "urn:ietf:params:rpp:profile:base-profile",
    "version": "1.0"
  }
}

{
  "name": "urn:ietf:params:rpp:profile:base-profile",
  "description": "A base profile for provisioning objects using the RPP protocol.",
  "version": "1.0",
  "rpp_version": "1.0",
  "objects": ["domains", "hosts", "entities"],
  "extensions": [
    {
      "rppOther": {
        "version": "1.0"
      }
    }
  ],
  "profile":
}

profile-header = "profile" "=" profile-name ";" OWS "version" "=" version
profile-name   = token
version        = 1*DIGIT "." 1*DIGIT

RPP-Profile: profile=urn:ietf:params:rpp:profile:example-profile;version=1.0

profile-parameter = "profile" "=" profile-name ";" OWS "version" "=" version
profile-name      = token
version           = 1*DIGIT "." 1*DIGIT

Accept: application/rpp+json; profile="urn:ietf:params:rpp:profile:example-profile"; version="1.0"
Content-Type: application/rpp+json; profile="urn:ietf:params:rpp:profile:example-profile"; version="1.0"

11. Endpoints

Endpoints are described using URI Templates [RFC6570] relative to a discoverable base URL, as recommended by [RFC9205]. Some RPP endpoints do not require a request and/or response message.¶

The RPP endpoints are defined using the following URI Template syntax:¶

• {c}: An abbreviation for {collection}: this MUST be substituted with "domains", "hosts", "entities" or another collection of objects.¶
• {i}: An abbreviation for an object identifier, this MUST be substituted with the value of a domain name, hostname, contact-id or a message-id or any other defined object.¶

A RPP client MAY use the HTTP GET method for executing informational request only when no request data has to be added to the HTTP message body. Sending content using an HTTP GET request is discouraged in [RFC9110], there exists no generally defined semantics for content received in a GET request. When an RPP object requires additional information, the client MUST use the HTTP POST method and add the query command content to the HTTP message body.¶

- Request: HEAD|GET {collection}/{id}/availability
- Request message: None
- Response message: Optional availability response

HEAD domains/foo.example/availability HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345

HTTP/2 404 Not Found
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:00:00 UTC
Server: Example RPP server v1.0
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
RPP-Svtrid: XYZ-12345
RPP-code: 01000
Content-Length: 0

GET domains/foo.example HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345

GET domains/foo.example HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
RPP-Authorization: authinfo value=TXkgU2VjcmV0IFRva2Vu

HTTP/2 200 OK
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:00:00 UTC
Server: Example RPP server v1.0
Content-Length: 424
Content-Type: application/rpp+json
Content-Language: en
RPP-code: 01000

TODO: JSON message here

GET messages HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345

HTTP/2 200 OK
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:00:00 UTC
Server: Example RPP server v1.0
Content-Length: 312
Content-Type: application/rpp+json
Content-Language: en
RPP-code: 01301

TODO

DELETE messages/12345 HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345

HTTP/2 200 OK
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:00:00 UTC
Server: Example RPP server v1.0
Content-Language: en
RPP-code: 01000
RPP-Queue-Size: 0
RPP-Svtrid: XYZ-12345
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
Content-Length: 145

TODO

POST domains HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Content-Type: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
Content-Length: 220

TODO

HTTP/2 200
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:00:00 UTC
Server: Example RPP server v1.0
Content-Language: en
Content-Length: 642
Content-Type: application/rpp+json
Location: https://rpp.example/domains/foo.example
RPP-code: 01000

TODO

DELETE domains/foo.example HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345

HTTP/2 200 OK
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:00:00 UTC
Server: Example RPP server v1.0
Content-Length: 80
RPP-Svtrid: XYZ-12345
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
RPP-code: 01000

TODO

POST /rpp/v1/domains/foo.example/processes/renewals HTTP/2
... other headers removed for bravity ...

{
    "duration": "P2Y"
}

POST /.../{collection}/{id}
...
{
    ... object data ...
    "processes": {
        "{process_name}": {
            ... process data ...
        }
    }
    ...
}

POST /rpp/v1/domains HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Content-Type: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
Content-Length: 220

{
    "name": "foo.example",
    "processes": {
        "creation": {
            "periods": "P2Y"
        }
    }
    ... other domain data ...
}

POST /rpp/v1/domains/foo.example/processes/renewals HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Content-Type: application/rpp+json
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
Accept-Language: en
Content-Length: 210

TODO: add renew request data here

HTTP/2 200 OK
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:00:00 UTC
Server: Example RPP server v1.0
Content-Language: en
RPP-Svtrid: XYZ-12345
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
Content-Length: 205
Location: https://rpp.example/rpp/v1/domains/foo.example/processes/renewals/XYZ-12345
Content-Type: application/rpp+json
RPP-code: 01000

TODO add renew response data here

POST /rpp/v1/domains/foo.example/processes/transfers HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
Content-Length: 0

POST /rpp/v1/domains/foo.example/processes/transfers HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
RPP-Authorization: authinfo value=TXkgU2VjcmV0IFRva2Vu
Accept-Language: en
Content-Length: 0

POST /rpp/v1/domains/foo.example/processes/transfers HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
Content-Length: 23

{
  "duration": "P2Y"
}

HTTP/2 200 OK
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:00:00 UTC
Server: Example RPP server v1.0
Content-Language: en
Content-Length: 182
Content-Type: application/rpp+json
Location: https://rpp.example/rpp/v1/domains/foo.example/processes/transfers/latest
RPP-code: 01001

{
  "trStatus": "pending",
  "reID": "ClientX",
  "acID": "ClientY",
  "reDate": "2000-06-06T22:00:00.0Z",
  "acDate": "2000-06-11T22:00:00.0Z",
  "exDate": "2002-09-08T22:00:00.0Z
}

GET /rpp/v1/domains/foo.example/processes/transfers HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345

GET /rpp/v1/domains/foo.example/processes/transfers HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
RPP-Authorization: authinfo value=TXkgU2VjcmV0IFRva2Vu

GET /rpp/v1/domains/foo.example/processes/transfers HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Authorization: authinfo value=TXkgU2VjcmV0IFRva2Vu
Content-Length: 0

HTTP/2 200 OK
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:00:00 UTC
Server: Example RPP server v1.0
Content-Length: 230
Content-Type: application/rpp+json
Content-Language: en
RPP-code: 01000

TODO

POST /rpp/v1/domains/foo.example/processes/transfers/cancelation HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345

HTTP/2 200 OK
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:00:00 UTC
Server: Example RPP server v1.0
Content-Length: 80
RPP-Svtrid: XYZ-12345
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
RPP-code: 01000

TODO

POST /rpp/v1/domains/foo.example/processes/transfers/rejection HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345

HTTP/2 200 OK
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:00:00 UTC
Server: Example RPP server v1.0
Content-Length: 80
RPP-Svtrid: XYZ-12345
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
RPP-code: 01000

TODO

POST /rpp/v1/domains/foo.example/processes/transfers/approval HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
Content-Length: 0

HTTP/2 200 OK
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:00:00 UTC
Server: Example RPP server v1.0
Content-Length: 80
RPP-Svtrid: XYZ-12345
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
RPP-code: 01000

TODO

PATCH domains/foo.example HTTP/2
Host: rpp.example
Authorization: Bearer <token>
Accept: application/rpp+json
Content-Type: application/rpp+json
Accept-Language: en
Content-Length: 252

TODO

HTTP/2 200 OK
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:00:00 UTC
Server: Example RPP server v1.0
Content-Length: 80
RPP-Svtrid: XYZ-12345
RPP-Cltrid: ABC-12345
RPP-code: 01000

TODO

12. Extension Framework

TODO¶

13. RPP Result Codes

RPP result codes are used to indicate the result of an RPP request. They are returned in the RPP-Code header of the HTTP response. The format of the RPP result code is a 5-digit string, where the first digit MUST always be "1", the second digit indicates the class of the result, and the remaining four digits indicate the specific result within that class, his allows implementers to define more specific result codes within each class. The classes of RPP result codes are designed to match the classes of HTTP status codes, to facilitate mapping between RPP result codes and HTTP status codes. The classes of RPP result codes are defined as follows:¶

• 11xxx: Informational¶
• 12xxx: Success¶
• 13xxx: Reserved for future use¶
• 14xxx: Client error¶
• 15xxx: Server error¶

The following RPP result codes are defined and used in this document:¶

14. Authentication and Authorization

Due to the stateless nature of RPP, the client MUST include the authentication credentials in each HTTP request. This MAY be done by using JSON Web Tokens (JWT) [RFC7519] or Basic authentication [RFC7617]. The server MUST validate the authentication credentials on each request and reject any request with invalid credentials with an appropriate HTTP status code.¶

When using JWTs for OAuth 2.0 [RFC6749] Access Tokens, the JWT profile described in [RFC9068] MUST be used. It is RECOMMENDED to use short-lived tokens and to implement token revocation mechanisms to mitigate the risk of token compromise. If sensitive information is included in the JWT payload, it MUST be encrypted to prevent unauthorized access when the token is persistent to a storage device. Furthermore, the best practices for JWT usage as outlined in [RFC8725] MUST be followed.¶

15. IANA Considerations

Registry name: rpp
Specification: This Document
Repository: ?
Index value: ?

Name of the registry: RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP)
Reference: This Document
IANA Registry Reference: TODO

Name of the registry: RPP Discovery URLs
Registry group: RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP)
Registration procedure: Expert Review

Name of the registry: RPP Extensions
Registry group: RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP)
Registration procedure: Expert Review

Name of the registry: RPP Profiles
Registry group: RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP)
Registration procedure: Expert Review

Name of the registry: RPP Result codes
Registry group: RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP)
Registration procedure: Expert Review

Type name: application
Subtype name: rpp+json
Required parameters: version
Optional parameters: "N/A"
Encoding considerations: "N/A"
Security considerations: "N/A"
Interoperability considerations: "N/A"
Published specification: This document
Applications that use this media type: RPP protocol and extensions
Fragment identifier considerations: "N/A"
Additional information: "N/A"
Person & email address to contact for further information: Author's email address
Intended usage: COMMON
Restrictions on usage: "N/A"
Author: Document authors
Change controller: Document authors
Provisional registration: No

16. Internationalization Considerations

TODO¶

17. Security Considerations

RPP relies on the security of the underlying HTTP transport, hence the best common practices for securing HTTP described in [RFC9325] also apply to RPP and MUST be followed by RPP implementations.¶

Data confidentiality and integrity MUST be enforced. Every client and server interaction MUST be encrypted using TLS version 1.3 [RFC8446]. Future versions of TLS MAY be used as they become available and are deemed secure.¶

18. Change History

19. Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the following people for their helpful text contributions, comments and suggestions.¶

• Q Misell, AS207960 Cyfyngedig¶

Authors' Addresses